Sunday, March 31, 2019

Judge restores Obama-era drilling ban in Arctic

President Donald Trump exceeded his authority when he reversed bans on offshore drilling in vast parts of the Arctic Ocean and dozens of canyons in the Atlantic Ocean, a U.S. judge said in a ruling that restored the Obama-era restrictions.
U.S. District Court Judge Sharon Gleason in a decision late Friday threw out Trump's executive order that overturned the bans that comprised a key part of Obama's environmental legacy.
Presidents have the power under a federal law to remove certain lands from development but cannot revoke those removals, Gleason said.
"The wording of President Obama's 2015 and 2016 withdrawals indicates that he intended them to extend indefinitely, and therefore be revocable only by an act of Congress," said Gleason, who was nominated to the bench by Obama.
A Department of Justice spokesman, Jeremy Edwards, declined comment Saturday.
The American Petroleum Institute, a defendant in the case, disagreed with the ruling.
"In addition to bringing supplies of affordable energy to consumers for decades to come, developing our abundant offshore resources can provide billions in government revenue, create thousands of jobs and will also strengthen our national security," it said in a statement.
Erik Grafe, an attorney with Earthjustice, welcomed the ruling, saying it "shows that the president cannot just trample on the Constitution to do the bidding of his cronies in the fossil fuel industry at the expense of our oceans, wildlife and climate."
Earthjustice represented numerous environmental groups that sued the Trump administration over the April 2017 executive order reversing the drilling bans. At issue in the case was the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act.
Acting Assistant U.S. Attorney General Jeffrey Wood said during a hearing before Gleason in November that environmental groups were misinterpreting the intent of the law written in 1953. He said it is meant to be flexible and sensible and not intended to bind one president with decisions made by another when determining offshore stewardship as needs and realities change over time.
In 2015, Obama halted exploration in coastal areas of the Beaufort and Chukchi seas and the Hanna Shoal, an important area for walrus. In late 2016, he withdrew most other potential Arctic Ocean lease areas — about 98 percent of the Arctic outer continental shelf.
The bans were intended to protect polar bears, walruses, ice seals and Alaska Native villages that depend on the animals.
In the Atlantic, Obama banned exploration in 5,937 square miles (15,377 square kilometers) of underwater canyon complexes, citing their importance for marine mammals, deep-water corals, valuable fish populations and migratory whales.


  1. Ive had manatee, camel, and bald eagle, but never polar bear meat. I got to try me some.

  2. ...I would prefer no offshore drilling, and the preservation of as much wildlife as possible anywhere on the planet. I don't know if drilling in the Arctic is needed, or is simply an economic exploitation to further enrich the elite. However, the Judge makes no that anything done or created by Executive Order is simply the guidance of the previous administration, and has nothing to do with current policies? A court has no jurisdiction approving one executive-era policy, vs. a future administration? If it's not in the law, the court has nothing to do with it. How can Obama's past power, exceed trump's current power, especially using the same governmental-device...The Executive Order? Was Obama's Constitutional...and Trump's not? That's the only basis for trying to reverse an Executive Decision. I'd tell the court to pound sand.
    RJ O'Guillory

  3. i guess the judge ruled that obama is still president